فیزیک

همجوشی ( گداخت ) سرد ( Coldfusion )

در این پاورپویت به بررسی مبحث همجوشی سرد یا همان به اصطلاح Cold fusion یا LENR پرداخته شده است. این پاورپویت رایگان دارای فیلم ارائه نیز هست و تمام فایل ها در لینک زیر قادر به دانلود هست. (به دلیل حجم بالا اینجا قابل بارگذاری نیست) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B07YKAd0GBbHnCdfOv9P_S4OEnHMIXDA/view?usp=drive_link در صورت سوال یا بهام با این شماره تماس بگیرید: 09371319186

محمد حسین دوامی

صفحه 1:
به نام خداوند بخشنده ی مهربان A summary of Cold Fusion محمد سس دوامی

صفحه 2:

صفحه 3:
۳ مقد تاه ‎xy‏ ‏مه و تاریخجه

صفحه 4:
اقتصاد مواد اوليه ‎i oN‏ محصول / ‎ole‏ و فناورزی “انرزى ارزش بازار انرژی دنیا سالانه حدود 7 تیلیارد دلار است

صفحه 5:
Chemical Reactions (eV) Useful power densities. Well engineered and widely used. فد ریز یسب سم Massive amounts oe of coal, oil and gas. Global warming !!

صفحه 6:
© . Some of the energy binding o's protons and neutrons in a nucleus n can be released and used. There are two ways to release energy stored in nuclei: Heavy nuclei of uranium or plutonium will split (fission) when impacted by a neutron. Light nuclei (isotopes of hydrogen) will join (fuse) when they hit each other at high kinetic energies ۳ ° » / ‏سد‎ J ۱۳ Sn 5 Hydrogen Deuterium Tritium Electron © Proton @ Neutron @

صفحه 7:
مت صحصحححححح] ‎They are driven by changes‏ ‎T‏ 9 3 1 nucleon binding energies. se Cu? As?> Mo” 5 Nuclear Fusion ‘I [E = me’ | 2 Average Binding Energy per Nucleon (MeV) Size of a Nucleus و او اس لت اس ا ا ا ا 303 ا 1 1 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 6 40 20 6 ۱ Number of Nucleons in a Nucleus

صفحه 8:
Presentation for NYU David J. Nagel Research Professor Contact: ‘viata tg Tompkins 105K | Ofc hours By Office Phone: 202.904.0109 sFP=iniment The George Washington University The Status, Momentum & Potential of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions - YouTube

صفحه 9:
Presentation at European Pog Pomerat Bill Colis Memorial Workshop eee ee! Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA YouTube

صفحه 10:
This presentation is about a potential new source of clean nuclear energy which is: Cheap due to energy gains. Distributed and maybe mobile due to high energy densities. Safe due to negligible dangerous radiation or radioactive waste. Free of greenhouse gases. This new source could do for energy what cell phones did for communications.

صفحه 11:
Potential of LENR Experiments have shown that LENR has several very attractive features, including high energy gains, high energy densities that enable small systems, lack of dangerous radiation when operating, absence of significant radioactive waste, and no greenhouse gases. Development of LENR generators could lead to having multi-kilowatt nuclear systems in homes.

صفحه 12:
Cold fusion (at about 1000 C max) a Muon-catalyzed fusion Solid state fusion Lattice confinement fusion LowEnergyNuclearReaction (LENR) Cold fusion

صفحه 13:
Muon-catalyzed fusion Muons are 207 times more massive than electron result 186 time closer Patra eves oor hoppent ob roe Bert wrens ore nettle, decay i 2 وه ها ماه ‎bePore‏ صوصخ بل ‎“aipko-sichiad" problew (roy about (OO‏ هم مارا Pov work every weeded ip woke wures ( partical accelerator) Atom begin to interact Sufficiently far apart asthey move closer together to have no interaction Internuclear distance (pm) achieve lowest overall 7 + oa di (#41 bond lenges)

صفحه 14:
مت صحصحححححح] ‎Muon-catalyzed fusion‏ Experimental evidence of muon production from a laser-wakefield accelerator L, Calvin', E. Gerstnaye! © €, Arran, L. Tudor, T. Foster! B. Berguanun’, D. Doria, B, Kettle H. Maguire, V, Malka, P. Manek, S. P. D. Mangles’, P. MeKenna™®, RE. Milai®®, ©. Ridge P. Smolyanskiy', Wilson”, RM "Dat, Pertadoun West, Fareham, United Kingdom Acceleron Fusion Secures $24M Series A Led by Lowercarbon Capital and Collaborative Fund to Revolutionize Clean Energy with Muon- Catalyzed Fusion = 566060 YF acceleron

صفحه 15:
Cold fusion (LENR) history Fleischmann-Pons Press Conference 23 March 1989 لال لكين ] ‎Martin‏

صفحه 16:
LENR The manner of announcement at a Press Conference The announcement was quickly sensationalized by both broadcast and print med Itv urpri ty, especially physicists, and to the public. It dealt and deals with a physics problem, but was announced by two chemists. The Fleischmann-Pons paper had not appeared by the time of the announcement. Physicists doing hot fusion research felt that their government funding was threatened. Some prominent physicists campaigned against results and research on cold fusion. The experiments were very small, especially compared to physics fusion experiments. The experiments appeared to be easy to perform, although that was proven to be wrong. Many early rep! were done hastily and poorly, and reported prematurely. The 1989 Department of Energy committee in the U.S. did not have access to all data. Experiments were initially, and commonly remain, both irreproducible and uncontrollable. Unknown problems with variations in materials characteristics were common and critical. Funding was not sufficient for parametric studies and for use of modern instruments. Experiments done in different labs were diverse and difficult to relate to each other. Cold fusion was (and is) commonly mocked in the media and books as science gone wrong. * Funding for needed systematic experiments was not provided by most governments. * The larger Scientific Community was not incentivized to perform LENR experiments. * The large available literature on LENR was and is ignored by the Scientific Community. ‏يي کی ی سب اه سب کی دی ی 1355025222 م ]ممه‎ a ‏اا بي‎ controvers ia. ¢ to the scientific commun 5 cation attempts

صفحه 17:

صفحه 18:
۱ 0 0 ل

صفحه 19:
Momentum of LENK LENR research has been done in a dozen countries. Japan has major LENR programs for many years. Google funded a LENR program from 2015 to 2019. The EU started two major LENR programs in 2021. Sporadic investment in LENR research in the U.S. The U.S. started a LENR program in January 2023.

صفحه 20:
LENR research in the US before 2015: ٠ No large-scale programs with cumulative, published results * One-off funding of smaller projects * Some continuity of research at certain sites (shoestring budgets), e.g.: + SRI International (McKubre) MIT (Hagelstein) University of Illinois (Miley) Naval Research Laboratories (Hubler) NASA Individual efforts (Storms, Letts, Cravens) Los Alamos (Claytor) University of Missouri Texas Tech University (Duncan) Coolescence and others eee eee rene

صفحه 21:
ب ‎Arough timeline —‏ 2014: 2015: 2020: 2021: 2022: 2023: 2025: Anthropocene Google Google ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E Institute gets ۰. 0 program LENR LENR program LENR program LENR program involved in start conclusion workshop announcement start conclusion LENR

صفحه 22:
sconnect between promise and support ve, and | joined forces in 2015 at Google ۳1 nes relevant tc fusion Recruit new x of against) Willingness to collaborate as a “Peer Group” and with Google Commitment to publish what is learned scientists on cold fusion (f cientists with,

صفحه 23:
Google cold fusion program Overview Some statist about our program 16 collaborations* & new academic groups 8 experienced LENR researchers/groups 6 more collaboration attempts were unsuccessful 12 calorimeter designs were qualified No lab work was conducted at Google $10 million invested in external sponsored research © Collaborations varied in duration and funding amount 27 peer-reviewed articles published to date e Including 6 Nature-family papers and 2 granted US patents e Complete list here: httos//groups.chem.ubc.caicberling/charleston/ * To ensure the privacy of all participants. our collaborations were under NDA. Full details can not be disclosed.

صفحه 24:
‘UBC fra, HARVARD Alm Mir 24۳00 Mes ‏كم‎ ۳ ۲۷۸۷۲۸۷۸۸ ———— TY 7 @ MAINLAND

صفحه 25:
Most impactful publication PERSPECTIVE “Finding breakthroughs requires risk taking, and we ee contend that revisiting cold fusion is a risk worth Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion taking. We hope our journey will inspire others to ‏تست‎ produce and contribute data in this intriguing parameter space ۲1 It is our perspective that the search for a reference experiment for cold fusion remains a worthy pursuit because the quest to understand and contro! unusual states of matter is both interesting and important.”

صفحه 26:
Google program: some key outcomes + Brought new researchers into the field + Demonstrated that LENR research can be designed such that it is not harmful to young people's careers * Nature Perspective article turned out to be impactful despite cautious framing + Concerns were voiced that replication attempts did not cover the right parameter space

صفحه 27:
ARPA-E 3% Blanguages v Article Talk Read Eolt Viewhistory Tools v From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (June 2023) ARPA-E, or Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy is an agency within the Advanced Research Projects United States Department of Energy tasked with funding the research and development Agency-Energy of advanced energy technologies.'"! The goal of the agency is to improve U.S, economic = 2) = “<& prosparity, national security, and environmental well being. ARPA-E typically funds ۷.۸: ‏خا"‎ ‎short-term research projects with the potential for a transformative impact. tis siden AREA inspired by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). oon 0 cn eee The program directors at ARPA-E serve limited terms, in an effort to reduce bureaucracy ‏ل‎ Governmental and bias. Since January 2023, the director is Evelyn Wang! ‏سیب‎ ‎Director Danie! Cunningham 1 000 (Acting) History and mission oxi) Us Department o organization Eneray Legislative history | 0s:) Website arpaeenergy.gove >

صفحه 28:
ARPA-studied the LENR landscape 2019-2021 Program team at the ARPA-E LENR workshop, October 21-22, 2021 e112. Or. Scott Hsu, Or. Katharine Or. Robert Ledoux, Mr. Sam Wurzel, Dr. Halle Cheeseman, Program Director —Greco,Fellow Program Director = T2M Advisor Program Director Or. Robert Thompson, Dr. Curt Nebrkorn, Dr. Colleen Nebr. Christina Leggett, Tech SETA Tech SETA Tech SETA ape SETA Science and Engineering Techeical Advisor

صفحه 29:
ب ‎Arough timeline —‏ 2014: 2015: 2020: 2021: 2022: 2023: 2025: Anthropocene Google Google ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E Institute gets ۰. 0 program LENR LENR program LENR program LENR program involved in start conclusion workshop announcement start conclusion LENR

صفحه 30:
The folowing teams have been selected to receive funding a part of the Advanced Research Projects Agency Energy (ARPA-E) LENR Exploratory Topic: «+ Amphionie (Dexter, Mi wl focus on exploring i LENR ave produced in potential wells existing between two nanoscale surfaces by controling m nanoparticle (NP) geometry. separation, composition, and deuterium loading, (Award amount: $295,924) + Energetics Technology Center (dian Head, MD) will use electrochemical codeposition of a deuterated palladium metal compound on a metal substrate conformed onto aplastic scntilator to establish and sustain LENR, (Award amount: $1,500,000) + Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley, CA) wil draw fro knowledge based on previous work using higher energy ion beams as an external ‘excitation source for LENR on metal hydrides electrochemical loaded with deuterium, The team proposes to systematically vary materials and ‏عقوم‎ while monitoring nuclear event rates with a suite of agnostics, (Award amount $1,500,000) + Massachusetts Insitute of Technology (Cambridge, MA) wil develop an experimental patform that thoroughly and reprodcibly ests clims of eucear ‘anomalies in gas loaded metaltydrogen systems. (Award amount: $2,000,000) + Stanford University (Redwood City CA) wl explore a technical slton based on LENR active nanoparticles and gaseous deuterium. (Award amount 180000) + Texas Tech University (Lubbock, TX) wil focus on advanced materials fabrication characterization, and analy nuclear products a a resource for teams within the LENR Exploratory Topi. (Award amount $1, 180.000) + University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MD il use a gas cycling expernent that passes deuterium gas through a chamber filed wt pallaum rnanoerystaline samples Variables wilinclude temperature nanocrystal sie, and laser wavelength, (Avard amount: $1,108.42) + University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MD il provide capably to measure hypothetical neutron, gamma and in miso rom LENR experiments. Modern instrumentation willbe couple wth bes practices in data acquisition, analysis, nd understanding f backgrounds to interpret colected data and evluaethe proposed signal. (Avard amount $902.219) ong with advanced detection of op Amphionic 8 ات energetics مور —_ Lace tre 1 1 Stanford University ‘TEXAS TECH Onivensity UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ___ https://arpa-e. energy. gov/news-and-media/press-releases/us-department-energy-announces-10-million-funding-

صفحه 31:
Questions that govern field formation 5۳0 6۷۵۱۵6۱0۵8 2 e.g. a novel class of nuclear reactions Increase of funding » & resources Enables systematic technology ¥ development e.g. deuteron proximity, coherent stimulation, etc. e.g. electron screening + Dicke-enhanced nuclear excitation transfer 1. Is there a new effect? 2. What are all key variables to cause the effect? (and relevant parameter ranges) 3. What is/are the underlying mechanism(s)?

صفحه 32:
Desired outcomes of an i At least one on-demand, repeatabl irrefutable LENR experiment satisfying agreed-upon metrics Present LENR Several multi- evidence at top disciplinary teams conferences and well-positioned for publish in top-tier follow-on funding, both journals public and private

صفحه 33:
From scientific understanding to commercial impact Basic research agencies (many projects each at hundreds $k/year) cientific understanding and explore multiple concepts ‘Stablish rigorous) widely accepted evidence ARPA-E ~$10M + partners Optimization & scaleup (One or more ARPA-E ~$30M programs + partners Development and demonstration Applied-energy and mission- driven agencies, VCs >>$100M

صفحه 34:
Goals * + “Akey goal of the Exploratory Topic is to obtain convincing empirical evidence of nuclear reactions in an LENR experiment and publication of the evidence in a top-tier peer- reviewed research journal.” + “Additional overarching goals of this Exploratory Topic are to bring together new perspectives and participants, modern state-of-the-art scientific and technical capabilities, and the experiences of long-time LENR practitioners.”

صفحه 35:
Nir Acknowledging what was done ‏سس‎ + “ARPA-E acknowledges the complex, controversial history of LENR beginning with the announcement by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons (FP) in 1989 that they had achieved deuterium-deuterium (D-D) ‘cold fusion’. + “Many groups from around the world continued to conduct varied LENR experiments and report evidence of excess heat and nuclear reactions (including neutrons, tritium, 3He, 4He, transmutation products and isotopic shifts) in hundreds of reports/paper.”

صفحه 36:
Wir Pointing out what is missing/what is needed =a + “However, repeatability of the key evidence over multiple trials of seemingly the same experiment remains elusive to this day. + This may be due to limitations in experimental and diagnostic techniques, a lack of awareness and/or control of the key triggers and independent variables of LENR experiments, and/or other reasons.” + “Results were typically not reported with the level of scientific rigor required by top-tier research journals.”

صفحه 37:
What qualifies as irrefutable evidence? eae ٠ Excess heat beyond chemical levels + Need to comprehensively characterize calorimeter + Need to conduct full accounting of mass and energy in the system * It’s a bigger step to take for skeptical observers * Unambiguously nuclear products + Neutrons, gammas, charged particles + Isotopic shifts ٠ Do not seem to be present in all LENR experiments but in some Not a major criterion: + Directly suitable for technology development (can happen farther down the line) _* Doesn't have to,-he the most impressive LENR result

صفحه 38:
‎an News‏ لت تا ‎Ecosystem for‏ مه ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎BUS » Business ImPACT Japan. 5 LENR NAL—9— U.S. Navy SPAWAR ee masubisni / TS rechnove Energitorsk SF! 8 ‏/ر‎ SX royeta coma! 104 ١ 9 / ‏ممه ري‎ RAD Labs Texas Tech oy B80 tore ‏و ات م-۱۸‎ Industrial Heat ane (۵ venuco SKINR~” 9 4 5 clean Nuclear Power ne Meme 9 ‏مهب و‎ Tohoku ۱ ‏مطله ؟‎ / ۱ ‏وس‎ ‎166۴ ‏عم سوب‎ 7 Cold Fusion Now ‎۳ ‎ome TS , ‏ع1‎ Magazine a CMNS Group Oar ‎= New Raenty ena ‎

صفحه 39:
Mixing and Motions of Protons and Deuterons with Materials Dynamics of Hydrogen Isotopes and Materials Mixing Motions I 1 Dry Mixing ||Co-Deposition|| Loading re Reo aeons 0 | Electrochemical || Hot

صفحه 40:
SOLID-STATE STRUCTURE HYDROGEN LOADING STIMULATION Bulk (oi) Laser Thin films Hydrogen diffusion (ster or ‏اس واه‎ Electrolysis on bombardment Electric pulses

صفحه 41:
Large variety of characterization modes Elemental analysis | eee Large variety of experimental سس Electrolysis fis LENR experiments Gas-loaded thin films سم 1 ‏60لهما-وة6‎ ‎Powders

صفحه 42:
Experimental Approaches to LENR Matérials Methods Measurements Ni & Alloys [Other Ma Sources of or D Nuclear | Prompt — [Low Energy P(orD) Means of Loading: Products | Radiations | Emissions Liquids & Electrochemical Gases & Thermodynamic Plasmas Beams The two most common combinations of reactants are Pd with D and Ni with H “Excess Heat” is the thermal energy out in excess of the input electrical ener; It is measured with calorimeters that give thermal power out as a function of time. Energy is the integral of the power over time.

صفحه 43:
7 FEW SOME 100% 3 ۸ ۱۱۷ 2.45 د ع ‎[He‏ + © 43.0 MeV 50% tot ۰ n 0 88 ‏مرحم‎ ev 0 5 He + ‏سح‎ | [XD NO Gavin RAV] L D+D=He 9 +0 —+— Gaussian tit on ee 208 208 NUMBER OF VALUES

صفحه 44:
ElectroChemical Experiments Ton Beam Collision Experiments The five “peaks” in both data sets align with each other !!

صفحه 45:
NUMBER OCCASIONS REPORTED ATOMIC NUMBER Figue 7, Histogram of the umber of pulsed pper ‏اهاط مور اس‎ the production of ‘peciic elements in LENR expeninens, a ‏لمجم‎ on ths plo from Somns. The dashed es correspond t he values ofZm the ible above Peet TU RUC ‏ات‎ CORTES Cig ee cal ea https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7GDdcD2jT4

صفحه 46:
"New elements from gas-loaded PdD thin films ۲ Biberian 2020 لیس نس ‎use,‏ ‘omiong 52535 ham ۳ ‏ری‎ ۳ posta mex “thal, mn Sabi ‏سم‎ peso ne 001 from the fission of Pd isotopes: — pg.105 Fe + Ca, Ni+K cone kev 80106 ۴۵۰ ‏بع لع يكء 20 رمع‎ Wit 1 peste 200608 ‏الال ايت‎ و 0

صفحه 47:
anomalies ‎|Beltyukov et al.‏ نگ ‎|Condens. Matter 19‏ ‎Violante et al, ‎lcondens: Matter Nucl. St (2016). wares and ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎IMckubre eta, ‏یت‎ ‎(1998) ‎Hagelstein, Letts Jand Cravens, J. ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

صفحه 48:
‘Semiconductor [#1 _ 9 publications 9 1500. 5 1000 500 260 1910 1920 ©1930-1940 ‘4980 Transistor sales [MS] 400 ۳ 1910 1920 0 wan TF /, “ta 1S de ot Prooto-principle یلق مس ی بت اراس ‎“sera‏ + ل ‎Losey eta Hen‏ ‎tia Mota 2001 SSRN‏ ‘28 toast

صفحه 49:
‎SSRN‏ 2021 تاه ‎{amplification} in Ge crystals ‎Cee ‎at erystal-erystal junctions {(pa-junetions) Matare 1948: Interference between point- ‘contacts in Ge crystals ‎ ‎[Negative resistance effect ‎Braun 1876: amplification) in crystals ‘Asymmetric conduction at metal-crystal junctions ‎Bose 1901, Pickard 1906: ‎Crystal rectifiers ‎

صفحه 50:
Materials Kénigsberger 1911: Teal, Welker 1941-1944: Elemental semiconductors Understanding doping classified — ‏ا‎ 0 00 Horovitz, Seitz, Baedeker 1910: Seidler 1941-45: Hall effect as a measure Impact of stoichiometry Czochralski 1916: enamide of charge density ‘on charge density Growth of monocrystals

صفحه 51:
Theory Bloch 1928: Slater, Wigner, Seitz 1934-37: Davydov 1942: ‘Quantum theory of metals Band structure calculations Surface states and ‘minority carriers Pauli, Sommerfeld 192 Semiclassical conduction rls, Wilson 1930-31: Schottky, Mott 1938-39: Drude 1900: theory Band structure theory Ricans Classical conduction theory Motzior 2021 SSRN

صفحه 52:
Wolfgang Pauli 1931: ea aaa es eee a كرت 60ت 0/5أتلا6600 )مع Bees 1910 19205 1930 1940 voltage ۱ The [semiconductor] crystal now replaces ae ene eae Ua cared experimenters have been able to o! 0 ‏و‎

صفحه 53:
‘Anomalies on 1540, ‘oun 76 E263910, Laphkaryor gsi Noth 1945 tosev 1910 Matar 1984 gy o¥e 2901, Pickard 1906 ‏م‎ Materials ‏ورورااضر‎ Konisbeeper 1913 LorkcHorovt Set, Baedeker 1910 CHOchaIH IOI Seger gatas Teal, Welker 1941-3944 on SYSTEM Slater, wignee = ۲۱۵۵۷ icen 1928 ‏روهزو بمو‎ OMYEOV IIS ‘rude 1900 9 ره Ut 393031

صفحه 54:

صفحه 55:
Materials Pitt & Gray 2003: Setayandeh 2020: Chiari 2021: Neutron fraction Detaled PdD phonon Ambient NiVaeD formation Mekeehan 1923: : ‏پر ی‎ susbests Toccupationin Pd mode characterization experimentally confirmed Fula 193: Zhang & Alavi 2005: Subashiew 2020: Creation of pavaco _PdVac0 shown to be Hvac formation at ‘under high pressure thermodynamicaly viable the PdD surface

صفحه 56:
Hagelstein 2018: Phonon-mediated nuclear excitation transfer Chumakov 2011 Nuclear superradiance Koonin & Nauenberg 1989; Haber 2017: Fusion rate enhancement Transfer or collective through proximity nuclear state ‘Assenbaum 1987: 5501 Fusion rate enhancement Framing fusion 95 a state via electron screening transition Theory DeLosh & Grant 1970: Mediated transfer of large excitation

صفحه 57:
‎Hagelstein 2030‏ ددمي وعألهوممم ‎ ‎Paneth 1926 Jones 989 Hake 2006 Fleischmann & Miles 1984 swore 2017 onsi965" Gor 1995 Materials Setayangeh 2020 —————— > ‎‘MeKeehan 1923 Pitt & Gray2003_Subashiev 2020 : Fukai 1993 Zhang & Alavi2005 Chari 2021 ‎Proototprincipte ‏مومت‎ ‎Theory Assenboum 1987 aber 2017 ‎Detosh & Koonin & Navenberg 1989 Hagelsten 2018 ‎Grant 1970 ‎Schwinger 1991 Chumakov 2018,

صفحه 58:
Status quo To summarize... ۰ ۸ ۱۵۲96 body of experimental reports + Taken together, it strongly suggests the presence of anomalies * Still: * continued controversy, lack of funding, lack of media coverage * Not enough convergence yet around ۰ a reference experiment * an actionable explanation > Solid-state fusion has not yet fully emerged as a field

صفحه 59:
بررسی مقاله مکانیزم های شناخته شده دانشگاه ۱۱۱۲

صفحه 60:
Supplementary Information of Known mochanians that inerense ncenr sion raten Prt Nee Ca Ha Lm Ni Gao anya ea Cond MA 8A frien ts plas ny pect ‏ده‎ ‘Thon er in oth atti BaF, Mong a Ma Lily Corn bert Pe, Uy of ‏بل هی‎ New Journal of Physics عه حيتي omen Known mechanisms that increase nuclear fusion rates inthe solid ۳۳ state Tm ante 6 Ret Ha Ce 33 ‏و[‎ ‏ا سم‎ muon, dro ban on ch efor Eo ‏حملت قد ل سس‎ mapas clined hin crt nd (he dno chun tal tar enon by wh echoed apd or {ahammar ‏سس‎ ‏لمعيه د سم مال مما فيد مان لس لس اجب مت‎ ‘toe Wr ony nh an ie ner en Wt ‏أجل مسنم سحت الج شسلها ل اسار اقيم مط ا‎ ‏وار‎ سار ‎af‏ سسب سيت ‎ee‏ 2 ‎ ‎

صفحه 61:
۳ near ‏و‎ — American Physical Society classification of physics subfields Table1 De:

صفحه 62:
Nuclear fusion in a metal lattice: relevant physics Table 1 Description of the first level of the classification scheme ۵ Description 0 General Physics 1 The Physics of Elementary Particles and Fields 2 3 ۱ : Electromagnetism, Optics, Acoustics, Heat Transfer, Classical Mechanics, and Fluid Dynamics Physics of Gases, Plasmas, and Electric Discharges 6 Condensed Matter: Structural, Mechanical and Thermal Properties 7 [Condensed Matter: Electronic Structure, Electrical Magnetic, and Optical Properties 8 Interdisciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology 9 Geophysics, Astronomy, and Astrophysics

صفحه 63:
ur team amb We seek to modify nuclear reaction rates in table-top configurations. In the 20" century, science mastered the precise control of electronic states; in the 21st century, we will master the precise control of nuclear states. Julian Schwinger: “One must ask if any conceivable mechanism now exists, or might be devised, whereby nuclear energy could be extracted by manipulations at the atomic level.” Wig ee" Wir ee" CAMBRIDGE 5 : 1 ‏و ۱ و‎ - Cavendish Laboratory Prof. Peter Hagelstein NY Dr. Florian Metzler Jonah Messinger Dr. Nicola Galvanetto Dr. Matt Lilley University of nucleonics.orj Zurich

صفحه 64:
Foundations The Atomic Physics Perspective * Quantum mechanics The Nuclear Physics Perspective — - ultimately an empirical theory + many successes over a century The Quantum Dynamics Perspective 1 * absence of a microscopic picture * Standard model * quantum electrodynamics * quantum chromodynamics + electroweak theory * Quantum hadrodynamics * provides basis for nucleon-nucleon interaction

صفحه 65:
Coulomb barrier Probability amplitude for D, molecule Tunneling through Coulomb barrier 0 Most probable separation at 0.74 Angstroms. ليه ۷ - 3103| (“0ل»25) -

صفحه 66:
Screening K. Czerski et al, Eur Phys JA (2006) K. Czerski et al, Europhys Lett (2001) 5 More than 10 orders of magnitude

صفحه 67:
150 50 100 Screening energy (eV) 41E-20 18-30 1E-40 18-50 1E-60 15-0 15-80 1E-90 15-0 Fusion rate (s*)

صفحه 68:
10 10% 100 10° 102 10 Fusion rate (s-') 10 10-6 10-9 <0 2 Octahedral D pair D3 in gas at Dp in vacancy of Observable fusion at In PdD lattice ambient conditions PdvacD ambient conditions وى 9 ۰ ° a

صفحه 69:
lead to local changes in the electron band structure, which can be interpreted as a larger cur- vature of the electron valence band and thus as a larger effective electron mass m’*. Since the screening potential U, depends on the effective elec- tron mass m’ (see Supplementary Note $2.3), some lattice sites would then provide for higher screening. Czerski et al. 2020", referring to Zhang et al. 1995%, argue that the effective electron mass m’ can locally be larger than the electron rest mass m, by a factor of 9, This conjecture is consistent with accelerator experiments that suggest a U_ of 300 eV from the deuteron bombardment of vacancy-rich Zr, whereby the theoretically predicted U, of pristine Zr is 112 eV*.

صفحه 70:
sitions, the tunneling probability must be evaluated across all occurring proximities resulting from fluctuations’. 4098225, This increase corresponds to an expected enhancement of D-D fusion rates of ~15 orders of magnitude.

صفحه 71:
The Nuclear Physics Perspect Nuclear physics frames fusion with more granularity than atomic phys- ics. Here, nuclei are seen not as point masses and point charges but as a) objects with intranuclear structure™. 8۳ eae arity is apparent from empirical fusion data® (Figure 3a). For example, 1077 proton-boron (p-"B) fusion exhibits peaks of the reaction probability near 162 keV and 675 keV. Atomic physics alone cannot account for < 10% D-T these peaks. The Gamow equation yields a smooth curve when reaction ‏ع‎ 4 probabilities are evaluated as a function of energy". Differences between § ‏حر‎ ‎reaction probabilities predicted by the Gamow model and empirical reac- B 107° tion probabilities are attributed to intranuclear structure that results from 8 ‏مه‎ ‎nucleon interactions. For p-''B fusion, the observed peaks originate 8 10% 5 103 10% 1 10 100 1000 Energy (keV)

صفحه 72:
The p-B and D-T resonances were not predicted, but measured. BEBE ‏تكن‎ resonances using first-principles nuclear modelsis sll aspirational Alyeto the complexity of calculating nucleon-nucleon interactions "~~ This complexity can be divided into three challenges: i) the strong nu- clear force exhibits three-nucleon effects in addition to nucleon-nucleon effects; ii) the strong nuclear force is strongly attractive at 1 fm < 2 fm, yet strongly repulsive at <1 fm, and; iii) the strong nuclear force is not organized around a center. ~ Relative energy BAU 8, No resonance has been experimentally detected for D-D fusion in the well-characterized high-energy (10-1000 keV) range* (Figure 3a). 98 [9 ‎potent‏ نا تون سود تیه #0 ‎conanoes‏ ‎۱ ‎ ‎1۱ hypothesis explaining 2 unexpectedly high D-D fusion yields in the medium-energy range is the ‎3 ‎‘RSNGIEZSSMIMEVE. The maximum of this resonance would be 0 10 2 30 40 0 in the low-energy range (<5 keV), with a tail that extends into the medi- interatomic estance (fm) um-energy range" ‎BA. Moreover, the sparse data sets in this range are inconsistent between ‎ ‎

صفحه 73:
sition of low-energy fusion ‏ها مادم‎ energies isan unsolved challenge in experimental nuclear physics™™, Un til this challenge is met, ambiguity about the role of intranuclear structure in low-energy fusion will remain. ‘(GHAREEE This includes a four-nucleon resonance that would explain unexpectedly high fusion rates measured in the medium-energy range. A combination of theoretical considerations and comparisons with experimental data led Czerski 2022* to predict resonance-based D-D fu- ‘sion rate enhancements by 3-7 orders of magnitude in the eV range (sc Supplementary Note $3 for a discussion of this predicted resonance and Fig. 3a for the experimental data used to motivate and calibrate it). Mean- ingful utilization of such a resonance would then require a high degree of precision and control over reactant energies and sample conditions. Application of this enhancement mechanism to a fusion rate of 10°"/s for D, in a palladium lattice with uniform electron screening at ambient con- ditions yields a fusion rate of 10-%/s, When combined with the 15 orders of magnitude enhancement from locally increased screening at lattice de- fect sites, as also posited in Czerski 2022", an overall fusion rate upwards of 10°°/s results. This is positioned within range of alleged “cold fusion” rates of >10°/s. Observable fusion at ambient conditions — when viewed through the lens of both atomic physics and nuclear physics — appears conceivable

صفحه 74:
ST: The Quantum Dynamics Perspective Thinking... * Coulomb barrier hinders fusion reactions near room temperature + Screening can make a big difference: e from 105 (molecule) to 10% (Pd) + Fusion rate for D, molecule near 10* sec, with screening near 10“? sec? + Incoherent fusion is too slow to be observed near room temperature + Incoherent fusion results in energetic products, which are not observed * Coulomb barrier is much bigger for Ni+H

صفحه 75:
Coherent fusion Incoherent fusion Nuclear fusion in a metal lattice: relevant physics Collective quantum effects

صفحه 76:
Issues Why coherent processes? “+ Absence of commensurate energetic nuclear products + Incoherent fusion (or fission) reactions a nonstarter for a theory Miche Sic reach ‏را‎ satiety Seal ‏مح اي جاه‎ omen: + always get energetic products for exothermic reactions 1 ۳ ۳ eRe Part + commensurate energetic particles are not seen + primary reaction products not observed in F&P experiments at levels 1 8 commensurate with energy produced oa ee + Where does the enerey eo? * phonons (acoustic, optical) asmons ‘spin waves

صفحه 77:
0000000 © 6 © © © © 6 0000000 © © © © © © 6 © © 6 © 6 © 6 © © © ه © © 6ه ووووووو ‎He‏ سير ۱۷ ۷ 6 ۷ و ويه ۰ في ۲ ۲ ۰ ‎ ‎a) ‎How might a coherent theory work ‏م‎ ‎+ Coherent dynamics involves transitions between states with same energy b) + Means that mass difference at each step must be taken up by. ‎+ phonons or plasmons or spin waves or other ‎ ‎‘fine print associated with loss of energy in phonons or piasmons... + can maintain coherence among nuclear states even with phonon loss. “Not going to work at all without mechanism for energy exchange

صفحه 78:
a 8 A 8 + Excitation transfer is a quantum coherent process * known in biophysics (important in photosynthesis) * excitation is moved from one system (A) to another (B) + observed experimentally, understood theoretically

صفحه 79:
Fusion and excitation transfer ‎Dw‏ عم ره لها له = سرت سوب ‎‘He 2۸‏ م ‎“He‏ ‎+ Excitation transfer from the D,/*He system to produce excitation elsewhere + mechanism consistent for fusion part of the problem associated with excess heat + He-4 preferred due to stability, transition matrix element ‎+ transfer of large 24 MeV quantum without 24 MeV gamma creation ‎‘A compelling solution in general (but the devil is in the details) ‎ ‎

صفحه 80:
Nit Key concepts and tools from my experience ۳ ‘Some key concepts: + Dicke model and variants + Dicke enhancement (superradiance, superabsorption, supertransfer) + Loss-inoise-enhanced transport + Downconversion, upconversion ‘Some key tools: + QuTIP (+computational notebooks) But just a subjective perspective ~ let's discuss Superradiance: This is a phenomenon in which W excited emitters are coupled together, which then deexcite at a rate proportional to N-—which is much faster than the typical exponential decay

صفحه 81:
Hamiltonian Ha ~ VY be (cia. 41) + ‏واميعة‎ fen = ThE) > Ty) (Oa hE Oe) ‏مله اه(‎ ۳ اب ,4 ‎x2‏ - سره

صفحه 82:
icke enhanced nuclear excitation ۲ At 2"4 transfer At n® transfer At 1" transfer (maximum) (minimum) Group b N,=9 Fusion rate thresholds Teecoh= ~10° s** ‏سر‎ ‎| | INoVNa VNo ‘Metzler et al,, J. New Phys, (2024) g & 2 1 Danae eee eck ‏جح‎ ‎TD,

صفحه 83:

صفحه 84:
Potential fission daughter pairs of Pd nuclei +163 mpatslons/ev as PERT] ee es ‏تومو‎ > ggPdIOX2 + 0 1d > yRUt 20 ‏عق + الاي 2 00م‎ ag? > + uePd > 29Cu + 1 Cl agPd > Ni + ‏ور‎ ‎16Pd > 3700 + ‏اور‎ ‏وصور‎ > »<Fe + Ca ‏عكري + والاور 2 00م‎ ‏اكير + عير ف لمهم‎

صفحه 85:
Coherent Fusion Introduction and history of lonah Messinger - IWAHLM-16 - A Quantum Dynami | The stab&!!Romentum & Potential of Low Ene N cs Model for LENR - YouTube uclear Reactions - YouTube Matt Lilley - IWAHLM-16 - Advanced Quantum Simu | Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA - YouTub lations with 2 QuTiP - YouTube Peter Hagelstein - ICCF25 - Coherent Nuclear Dynam| Florian Metzler, PhD - ICCF25 Open Lecture ICCF25 $ ics for the Nuclear part of LENR Models - YouTube olid State Fusion as an Emerging Field Past - YouTube ICQE23 Day 3 Florian Metzler - Quantum Augmente d Nuclear-Engineering - YouTube ICCF24 Presents: Peter Hagelstein - Models for Acce erated Nuclear De-excitation - YouTube “Toward a LENR reference experiment" F. Metzler at the ARPA-E Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Worksho p - YouTube

صفحه 86:
منت جمع بندی و پيشنهادات

صفحه 87:
fusion. Cold fusion hot fusion ye — Ai ۹ uon-catalyzed fusion Solid state fusion Ve \ Lattice confinement fusion LowEnergyNuclearReaction (LENR) 5 3 Cold fusion magnetic confinement inertial (ex Tokamak at Iter or confinement stellarator) 2,2 D> RS ger ‏و‎

صفحه 88:
Physical Review C Papers: Bremsstrahlung-induced Nuclear iat rt Reactions in Electron Screened, Deuterated Metal Lattices ater Ss Theoretical Electron Screened Enhanced Cross Sections ‎muses, 29 Mev. E300‏ مهم 6812 اهو ‎Dida ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‏ی ‎١ ‎ ‎ ‎Neos ues (SH ‏8 8889و ‎ ‎۱ Newson energy (=¥) ‎Fast Neutrons Observed ‎Lattice Confinement Fusion

صفحه 89:
nae ord Fuel Density | Confinement een ec a ‏سا‎ ۳3 “Centimeters + Deuterated| 10.10% Indefinite heats" Confinement (scalable) metals (eg (ee.ntrom Fusion (Uc) 05,71) photoneutzon) {New Process) + other New Process? Magnetic Meters. + DD. ‏“م1‎ Seconds Plasma Confinement +r Fuson (MCF) > ‏رت‎ ‏اقلعم‎ 00-000 1 Confinement core fusion (cr) ‏دوه‎ ‏نما‎ ‎Fusion) Figure 3¢Compansons among Lattice Canfine sment and Magnetic Confinement Fusion

صفحه 90:
COMMONWEALTH FUSION generalfusion 5 tokamak energy 72 10 TECHNOLOGIES ١ ‏4ه‎ ‎CTFusion G Cc 1 > 7 002 ۲۷۱5۱۵۱۷ ‏و ره‎ Sere Saale

صفحه 91:
Ti 8 ۳ =e ۳

صفحه 92:
‘Global Fusion Private Companies Map ‘By Continent Canada Great Britain ‘Tokamak Energy Crossfield Fusion First Light Fusion ‘Avalanche Energy Blue Laser Fusion Commonwealth FS Electro Fusion Systems Exo Fusion Kyoto Fusioneering Helicity Space EXFusion Helion Energy Helical Fusion Horne Technologies ~o Hyperdet Fusion ۰ 1 ‏ايسا‎ ‎Europe Asia 0 ed ENN (CHN) LPPFusion Focused Energy (GER) NT-Tao (ISR) MIFTI Gauss Fusion (GER) NearStar Fusion Proxima Fusion (GER) (NK Labs Marvel Fusion (GER) Princeton Fusion Systems Renaissance Fusion (FRA) 5 Realta Fusion Deutelio (TL) Oceania Shine Novatron (SWE) B11 Energy (AUS) Stellarex ‘OpenStar (NZL) TAE Technologies ‘Thea Energy Type One Energy Xeimer Energy Bo lee 7aP For

صفحه 93:
iG Nuclear Fusion ITER (>>$20B and > 20 years) و ل 9 سح — eM ee ee) feasibility of fusion energy as a future eneray source. Thi eee ee ume td ۱۵۲۵۵ 10 eee cue ‏اه ماقو مملوية‎ eee UR eee a etm a espe Pu Re ahah ewe emer ero) eo

صفحه 94:
Cracks in pipes Pru aOR ho

صفحه 95:
capacity, to allow testing during SRO that can simulate the full heat loads to be experienced in DT operations. All systems, including the disruption mitigation system, will be fully tested during the SRO phase. How do the schedules compare in the previous baseline and the new baseline? The 2016 Baseline ving First Plas with relatively minimal scientific value, to be followed by four stages of assembly and construction, achieving full plasma current in 2033. The new baseline envisions the featuring a more complete machine, to be followed by 27 months of substantive research. The achievement of full magnetic energy will be about 3 years delayed from the previous baseline, from 2033, now targeted in 2036. Deuterium-deuterium fusion operation is targeted for 2035, about the same time as in the previous baseline. The Start of Deuterium-Tritium Operation Phase will be about 4 years delayed from the previous baseline, from 2035 to 2039. envisioned ach na in 2025, as a brief, low-e gy machine tes ‘One further key feature of the new baseline is that we will use tungsten instead of beryllium for the م ‎ITER fusion project confirms more delays and €5B cost overrun‏ ‎jut 2028 | News‏ 04( The experimental reactor won't start operating until 2034, nine years later than the last estimate By David Matthews

صفحه 96:
Is the dream of nuclear fusion dead? Why the international experimental reactor is in ‘big trouble’ ‘The 35-nation Iter project has a groundbreaking aim to create clean and limitless energy but itis turning into the ‘most delayed and cost-inflated science project in history’ اتنا Analysis and Physies ل ا ل ۱۳۰۰ ‎lems Comte‏ ?2035 ۳ ere

صفحه 97:
Is the world’s biggest fusion ITER delays first plasma for world's experiment dead after new de ۲ ig by adecade 2035? Tusion power igus MER, 3€20 ion nurs eacrun corso Fan ‎on until 2035 - a delay of 10 years. With smaller commercial fusion‏ حسميو ی و ‎ewhatit means for worth continuing with tis gargantuan project? ‏رو ‎TER delay: oe eee Maclear fusion cpenearentsenah ‎mentite ۶ ‏و‎ ascents ‎Xi see ‎“the world's biggest fusion ‎‘oc the projects ‏یل ‎in €5bn Bra Nposiponed by a decadg ‎»verhaul ‎ ‎ ‎ITER fusion project confirms more delays and €51 ‎B cost overry sticle by Anigab Maid ‎eam a wot at pcg wi 2034 yas er hone 52-5

صفحه 98:
Hot 5 hot ss) ‏بروژه های خصوصی و تحت جَمايت دولت:هاى ال در حال تحقیق و آزمایش‎ 5 هستند. 2-هزینه های عملیاتی و آزمایشی در 605۱00 ۱06ابسیار زیاد است (شرکت های مطرح دارای بودجه ی بالای 1 میلیارد دلار هستند) 3-همچنان با گذشت 70 سال صرف هزینه زیاد روی پروژه 5100] 00۲ و وعده انرژی رایگان و بدون حد, همچنان به انرژی مثبت نرسیده و تاخیر و افزایش هزینه, در اين پروژه ها متداول است. 4- پروژه بین المللی ۱۲۵۲ که همکاری کشورهای مطرح در اين زمینه هست و به عنوان بزرگترین پروژه همجوشی شناخته می شود, چند بار دچار بحران های مختلف شده که باعث 16 سال تاخیر و افزایش بودجه شده (از 5 میلیارد یورو تا حدود 25 میلیارد یورو) و انتقاد های فراوانی به اين پروژه وارد شده. 5سا توجه به ایتکه کشور ما دیرتر از سایر کشور ها در زمیته ی همجوشی فعالیت خود را اغاز کردم وبودجه و تیم علمی بسیار بسیار کمتری دارد: احتمال رسیدن به انرژی مثبت در 500ا؟ 006, زود تر از سایر کشور ها تفریبا صفر ات

صفحه 99:
Cold ۳ 1- در صورت امکان پذیری, بهترین نوع انرژی ‎shot fusion sllio fusion.‏ 59 سطح خانه ها و وسایل نقلیه هم قابل استفاده است) 2-به اين زمينه بسیار کم توجهی و بودجه ی کمی اختصاص داده شده است و بخاطر فضاى منقى عليه اين زمينه تحقیقات بسیار کمتری به نسبت 5۱00] ۵۲ انجام شده است. 3-گزارش های 200702:65 آزمایشگاهی زیادی در این زمینه چاپ شده است ولی هنوزدلایل این پدیده ها مشخص نیست. 4-هزينه هايى اجرايى و آزمايشى در 105100 0۱0 بسیار کم است. در صورت واقعی بودن ۵5108 ‎cold‏ احتمال رسیدن کشور ما به انرژی مثبت زودتر از سایر کشور ها, بیشتر ‎fusion jl‏ 0۶ است .

صفحه 100:
Coherent Fusion Introduction and history of lonah Messinger - IWAHLM-16 - A Quantum Dynami | The stab&!!Romentum & Potential of Low Ene N cs Model for LENR - YouTube uclear Reactions - YouTube Matt Lilley - IWAHLM-16 - Advanced Quantum Simu | Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA - YouTub lations with 2 QuTiP - YouTube Peter Hagelstein - ICCF25 - Coherent Nuclear Dynam| Florian Metzler, PhD - ICCF25 Open Lecture ICCF25 $ ics for the Nuclear part of LENR Models - YouTube olid State Fusion as an Emerging Field Past - YouTube ICQE23 Day 3 Florian Metzler - Quantum Augmente d Nuclear-Engineering - YouTube ICCF24 Presents: Peter Hagelstein - Models for Acce erated Nuclear De-excitation - YouTube “Toward a LENR reference experiment" F. Metzler at the ARPA-E Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Worksho p - YouTube

صفحه 101:
Supplementary Information of Known mochanians that inerense ncenr sion raten Prt Nee Ca Ha Lm Ni Gao anya ea Cond MA 8A frien ts plas ny pect ‏ده‎ ‘Thon er in oth atti BaF, Mong a Ma Lily Corn bert Pe, Uy of ‏بل هی‎ New Journal of Physics عه حيتي omen Known mechanisms that increase nuclear fusion rates inthe solid ۳۳ state Tm ante 6 Ret Ha Ce 33 ‏و[‎ ‏ا سم‎ muon, dro ban on ch efor Eo ‏حملت قد ل سس‎ mapas clined hin crt nd (he dno chun tal tar enon by wh echoed apd or {ahammar ‏سس‎ ‏لمعيه د سم مال مما فيد مان لس لس اجب مت‎ ‘toe Wr ony nh an ie ner en Wt ‏أجل مسنم سحت الج شسلها ل اسار اقيم مط ا‎ ‏وار‎ سار ‎af‏ سسب سيت ‎ee‏ 2 ‎ ‎

صفحه 102:
ب ‎Arough timeline —‏ 2014: 2015: 2020: 2021: 2022: 2023: 2025: Anthropocene Google Google ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E ARPA-E Institute gets ۰. 0 program LENR LENR program LENR program LENR program involved in start conclusion workshop announcement start conclusion LENR

صفحه 103:
با تشکر از توجه شما

به نام خداوند بخشنده ی مهربان ‏A summary of Cold Fusion محمد حسین دوامی فهرست مطالب تاریخچه و مقدمه بررسی مقاله مکانیزم های شناخته شده جمع بندی و پیشنهادات فصل اول مقدمه و تاریخچه اقتصاد مواد اولیه محصول علم و فناوری ارزش بازار انرژی دنیا ساالنه حدود 7تیلیارد دالر است انرژی Presentation for NYU The George Washington University The Status, Momentum & Potential of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions - YouTube Presentation at European Parliament Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA - YouTube Cold fusion (at about 1000 C max) Muon-catalyzed fusion Solid state fusion Lattice confinement fusion LowEnergyNuclearReaction (LENR) Cold fusion Muon-catalyzed fusion Muons are 207 times more massive than electron result 186 time closer fusion events can happen at room temperature muons are unstable, decaying in 2.2 μs "alpha-sticking" problem (only about 100 d–t fusions before sticking to an alpha particle) Too much energy needed to make muons ( partical accelerator) Muon-catalyzed fusion Cold fusion (LENR) history LENR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7GDdcD2JT4 فصل دوم بررسی مقاله مکانیزم های شناخته شده دانشگاه MIT The Atomic Physics Perspective The Nuclear Physics Perspective The Quantum Dynamics Perspective The Nuclear Physics Perspective The Quantum Dynamics Perspective Coherent fusion Incoherent fusion Superradiance: This is a phenomenon in which N excited emitters are coupled together, which then deexcite at a rate proportional to N2—which is much faster than the typical exponential decay Coherent Fusion Jonah Messinger - IWAHLM-16 - A Quantum Dynami cs Model for LENR - YouTube Matt Lilley - IWAHLM-16 - Advanced Quantum Simu lations with QuTiP - YouTube Introduction and history of LENRMomentum & Potential of Low Energy N The Status, uclear Reactions - YouTube Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA - YouTub e Peter Hagelstein - ICCF25 - Coherent Nuclear Dynam Florian Metzler, PhD - ICCF25 Open Lecture ICCF25 S olid State Fusion as an Emerging Field Past - YouTube ics for the Nuclear part of LENR Models - YouTube ICQE23 Day 3 Florian Metzler - Quantum Augmente d Nuclear-Engineering - YouTube ICCF24 Presents: Peter Hagelstein - Models for Acce lerated Nuclear De-excitation - YouTube "Toward a LENR reference experiment" F. Metzler at the ARPA-E Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Worksho p - YouTube فصل سوم جمع بندی و پیشنهادات fusion Cold fusion uon-catalyzed fusion Solid state fusion Lattice confinement fusion LowEnergyNuclearReaction (LENR) Cold fusion hot fusion magnetic confinement (ex Tokamak at Iter or stellarator) inertial confinement (ex with lasers at NIF) Hot ‏fusion -1پروژه های خصوصی و تحت حمایت دولت های زیادی با روش های مختلف در حال تحقیق و آزمایش روی hot fusionهستند. -2هزینه های عملیاتی و آزمایشی در hot fusionبسیار زیاد است (شرکت های مطرح دارای بودجه ی باالی 1 میلیارد دالر هستند) -3همچنان با گذشت 70سال صرف هزینه زیاد روی پروژه hot fusionو وعده انرژی رایگان و بدون حد ،همچنان به انرژی مثبت نرسیده و تاخیر و افزایش هزینه ،در این پروژه ها متداول است. -4پروژه بین المللی Iterکه همکاری کشورهای مطرح در این زمینه هست و به عنوان بزرگترین پروژه همجوشی شناخته می شود ،چند بار دچار بحران های مختلف شده که باعث 16سال تاخیر و افزایش بودجه شده (از 5 میلیارد یورو تا حدود 25میلیارد یورو) و انتقاد های فراوانی به این پروژه وارد شده. - 5با توجه به اینکه کشور ما دیرتر از سایر کشور ها در زمینه ی همجوشی فعالیت خود را اغاز کرده و بودجه و تیم علمی بسیار بسیار کمتری دارد ،احتمال رسیدن به انرژی مثبت در ،hot fusionزود تر از سایر کشور ها تقریبا صفر است. Cold ‏fusion -1در صورت امکان پذیری ،بهترین نوع انرژی خواهد بود (به عالوه ی تمام مزایای ،hot fusionدر سطح خانه ها و وسایل نقلیه هم قابل استفاده است) -2به این زمینه بسیار کم توجهی و بودجه ی کمی اختص—اص داده شده است و بخاطر فضای منفی علیه این زمینه تحقیقات بسیار کمتری به نسبت hot fusionانجام شده است. -3گزارش های anomaliesآزمایشگاهی زیادی در این زمینه چاپ شده است ولی هنوزدالیل این پدیده ها مشخص نیست. -4هزینه هایی اجرایی و آزمایشی در cold fusionبسیار کم است .در صورت واقعی بودن cold fusionاحتمال رسیدن کشور ما به انرژی مثبت زودتر از سایر کشور ها ،بیشتر از hot fusionاست . Coherent Fusion Jonah Messinger - IWAHLM-16 - A Quantum Dynami cs Model for LENR - YouTube Matt Lilley - IWAHLM-16 - Advanced Quantum Simu lations with QuTiP - YouTube Introduction and history of LENRMomentum & Potential of Low Energy N The Status, uclear Reactions - YouTube Florian Metzler - LENR Research in the USA - YouTub e Peter Hagelstein - ICCF25 - Coherent Nuclear Dynam Florian Metzler, PhD - ICCF25 Open Lecture ICCF25 S olid State Fusion as an Emerging Field Past - YouTube ics for the Nuclear part of LENR Models - YouTube ICQE23 Day 3 Florian Metzler - Quantum Augmente d Nuclear-Engineering - YouTube ICCF24 Presents: Peter Hagelstein - Models for Acce lerated Nuclear De-excitation - YouTube "Toward a LENR reference experiment" F. Metzler at the ARPA-E Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Worksho p - YouTube با تشکر از توجه شما

رایگان