صفحه 1:
اکتساب تکنولوژي: ..
روش ها و مفاهیم
آزیتا کرمي پور
SLI ORL
صفحه 2:
جایگاه " اکتساب تکنولوژي " در تدوین استراتژي تکنولوژي
De Ra eae
روش دستيابي به تکنولوژي زمان دستيابي به تكنولوژي .
صفحه 3:
Technolegy- Acquisition & Development
متا
[
۸
متسیس
۱
۲
Appropriate Way of
gaining access to technology
Appropriate Source of Technology
صفحه 4:
TERMINOLOGY
(Technology sourcing) .s3s):5 فد منبع يابي
ع ا ا
Technology Acquisition) ) اكتساب تكنولوزي *
صفحه 5:
ORGANIZATIONAL MODES OF
TECH. SOURCING
= Formal-modes:
= More than 14 modes exist.
* Informal modes
صفحه 6:
اتحاد
ALLIANCE
eee ere ees eee Bes
كنيد
[Or
Sa eae ا
Ree rere
* دو متحد منابع (650۱1۲665)خود را به اشتراك بگذارند.
Re TACO a ل ل
ا 0 1 ٩
صفحه 7:
۱۱236۱۱/۵ obs!
(ALLIANCE
هدف برقرري ارتباط به دست آوردن يك تکنولوژی یا نوآوري تکنولوژیك است.
۱۰۳
شرکت ۸۸
صفحه 8:
انواع اتحاد
اتحاد افقى (ع 1113066 یره وزیا
اتحاد عمودي Wertical Alliance)
صفحه 9:
SCALE AND COMPLEMENTARY
ALLIANCE
Matra-Renault Renault
ase
aE PSA
5-2
صفحه 10:
A GENERAL FRAME FOR EXTERNAL
TECHNOLOGY SOURCING
Modes definition Index
Allocation of Activities BC
- Management of - Property
- Financial the Activity > Exploitation
Resources ۱۱
0 resourced used
وومتبا0ومظ
- Technological
0
صفحه 11:
ALLIANCE
0
Resources Activities Results
Property of |iManagementi| | Prope
san ةم" إءا.. resources a دابا
+ us¢d 1 Exploitation
1 1
تحار نان تن
و ۳
7 جح ©9066 | ]©
ea م۳9 رم
صفحه 12:
JOINT VENTURE
Resources Activities Results
eee Property of ||Management|| [ Property
060 ظ2 لاي ةا 15
used; سمه ]مامد
تن
Technologi
1 ۳۹ و مر ae هص جوم +...
/ م كن
ea "0
صفحه 13:
R&D OUTSOURCING
SUB-CONTRACTING
Resources Activities Results
bee an oma ل
0 رت لاي ةا 05
من 1
و
29 6 ea
ه26 i ۱ sy
م۳5 ام
(0 9
صفحه 14:
Results
1
۱
اك
LICENSE PURCHASE
Management
1
Activities
Pea جاسم 05
2601
568
a5.
وم موم
Financial
Technologi
ew
ا"
4
صفحه 15:
COMPLEMENTARY LICENSE PURCHASE
Activities Results وم موم
oss oa | ec ueeiseetetc| Ml Mibcoae eee تا =
05 رت لاي ةا 0
1 من
Technologi
ل ee qe a
ل
Physical
صفحه 16:
LICENSE SWAP
CROSS- LICENSING
iterates a || وملعم ۱۹
ی
Financial resources
سمه ]مامد
Fai Technologi |
ree aS 6
qd 9 أت هم
ا"
: ۱ توومامصطه16 1
2 ۱ 111120 (9
Lene
صفحه 17:
FIRM TAKE OVER ( ACQUISITION)
Resources Activities Results
bee an oma ل
0 رت لاي ةا 05
used; سمه ]مامد
و 8
(۳5 تم 4
ined qe الج J
م۳5 ام |
و۵3
صفحه 18:
MERGERS
1
= + شرکت ۸۸
و
صفحه 19:
CHARACTERISTICS OF TECHNOLOGY
SOURCING MODES (SHILLING, 2005)
میج
تست Por مسج
جاه واس طامط 0ك ا
power ا اا ا
Leal
9 ول تس یه سا ee
ee a See 0 100 سين
2 سس
Nee ۷ ع ee a
سس ated ا ل ]
صفحه 20:
MODES USED IN IRANIAN HI-TECH
۳۱۳
Variety in Technology Sourcing Modes
Joint Taje-over
Firm take-over
License 5
Complementary License purchase
Peg m Number of cases
R&D Outsourcing
Joint venture
Alliance
RED Collaboration
50 after internal R&D,
ice source of technology for
3 Patt esos and acquisition modes are used equally
و ا ا
صفحه 21:
STEPS OF GAINING ACCESS TOA
TECHNOLOGY
~ Choosing a mode (or a combination of
modes) of TS
= What are the characteristics of each mode?
* What are determinants affecting modes of TS?
* Choosing and monitoring source firm
(partner)
صفحه 22:
SHILLING’S MODEL (2005)
a 8 امسا
0 - 5
Sed 3
سل - 2
ل( سنج 5-6 7
رس
صفحه 23:
HOFFMAN & SHAPER-RINKEL’S
MODEL (2001)
company linkages |
{ tee 55 fe
| forfitting legal maintaining legal
independence (merger) independence
ener co-operation
I
minority |
strategic
majority interest | operative ی
interest wil 2
ontroliing | | Seperation) | (ajtiance)
agreement
آزیند کيمي پور لتر ملد 130
صفحه 24:
JOLLY’S MODEL
آزیند کيمي پور لتر ملد 130
صفحه 25:
عوامل برون بنگاهي
Fone Res
نرخ نواوري تكنولوزيك
۳
1 oe ead
| قوانين مالياتي
صفحه 26:
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUPS
هد
سین تن
of TSMs
صفحه 27:
KOREA LEGISLATIONS (KIM & KIM,
1985)
The firms’ products characteristics should
have:
been developed with local patents or
with a new technology
A domestic parts ratio of over 60 %
Been developed for the first time in Korea
without any technical collaboration from
abroad
~ quality comparable or better than foreign
۲ Wa as determined by a government
nstitute
صفحه 28:
CHOOSING A TECHNOLOGY
SOURCING MODE (FORD, 1988)
يس ا Oe ak Cee
۳ تا 0ك بدت
تست
Oe مج سا سا vs اس
احج 0 شا
اه تسه تساه سا سوه
bt
é tower Ohad Chord 0
Cera) جرا beers bikie ee) ve
سم
صفحه 29:
MAKE -BUY -ALLY ی
AL., 2005)
High
Medium وميم
Low
Competence compared with best in market
صفحه 30:
TECHNOLOGY - RELATED DETERMINANTS
صفحه 31:
FIRM SPECIFIC DETERMINANTS
eel Cala رن را
eel
ee
prea 6 (4)
soe he ES lll |
3 =
Low, ۴ Semel ۱
oon 0 oh
اد ee هنن sale
Been 1
80 ۳
=o
Conteh ete
Successful ate
۲1
60 اناد
صفحه 32:
REASONS FOR GOING SOLO
Availability of capabilities
~ if the firm has all necessary capabilities
~ If the required capabilities are not fount in any
partner
Protecting proprietary technologies
“ Controlling technology development and use
~ To have complete control on technology
development because:
~ Pragmatic reasons
~ Cultural reasons
Building and renewing capabilities
~ Sometimes the potential for creating and
the firm’s capabilities may be more
: ۱۱۰۱۸۱۱:
صفحه 33:
BUILDING & RENEWING
CAPABILITIES:
Walt Gillette of Boeing (running Sonic Cruiser
project):
“Industry experience indicates that if the
company doesn't create a new airplane every
12 to 15, years the needed skills and
experiences will be gone.”
صفحه 34:
REASONS FOR COLLABORATING
- To Enable firm obtaining skills or
resources more quickly
~ Example: Apple and Canon alliance on Laser
و
To obtain some of the necessary
resources and capabilities
To learn from the partner.
’ To share the cost and risks of projects.
: cilitate the creation of a shared
صفحه 35:
CHOOSING THE PARTNER (SOURCE
FIRM)
Does the firm really have the technology/ capability which
alors
Does the firm give the technology as | think?
* Establishing appropriate monitoring and governance
mechanisms.
كيلا =
Should be socially created.
Three level of making trust
۱ تن 105
ا ae
tween individuals of groups
صفحه 36:
PARTNER SELECTION
Resource fit : the degree to which potential partners have
resources that can be effectively integrated into a
strategy that creates value.
Strategic fit: the degree to which partners have
compatible objectives and styles.
صفحه 37:
CO-OPERATION STRATEGY
cooperative strategy means the strategies both parties took in
the further development of relationships, Including
terminating relationship,
maintaining relationship
extending relationship (Su et al. 2008)
صفحه 38:
NUMMI (NEW UNITED MOTOR
MANUFACTURING, INC.)
A 50-50 joint venture between GM and Toyota to assemble a new
cee
Established in 1983.
GM's objective:
a small car supply;
3 ing an idle plant;
Reali RO ENR CIMNC(or-In elt et tat ic eMart Meal)
GM about the value of the learning opportunity.
ا oe
Countering Honda and Nissan;
Waal clitecla ie Colt ce ا 1 ا ومتموعا
صفحه 39:
J.V'S AGREEMENT
Toyota had operating responsibility for the plant (1984).
GM is allowed to contribute 16 managers.
صفحه 40:
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN GM
short visits and the use of GM managers
assigned to NUMMI for two years.
Many managers became frustrated when they
reentered GM because they were unable to
implement the ideas they had learned from
.الا نالا
١ عاممعم 5ه حصوعغ شق غاأناط طغتمك عالق8 who
understood lean production, many of them with
experience in NUMMI.
Technical Liaison Office (TLO) was established م
‘acilitate knowledge transfer and
صفحه 41:
IMPLICATIONS
NUMMI has become the centerpiece of GM’s efforts to
adopt lean manufacturing.
The first major application of NUMMI knowledge was a
greenfield site in Eisenach, Germany.
صفحه 42:
PATENTS
Ce arora eae oe (ك0انات- و0اطات)
Cee pect cae eae ee)
صفحه 43:
DISNEY- PIXAR ALLIANCE
صفحه 44:
ار
صفحه 45:
KINDS OF PRODUCT INNOVATIONS
(HENDERSON & CLARK, 1990)
a product is a set of components.
Component: a physically distinct portion of the
product that embodies a core design concept
(Clark, 1985) and performs a well-defined
function.
' successful product development requires two
types of knowledge;
component knowledge, or knowledge about each of the
core desig ncepts and the way in which they are
__ implemented in a particular component.
architectural knowledge or knowledge about the ways in
nts are integrated and linked together
صفحه 46:
KINDS OF PRODUCT INNOVATIONS
(HENDERSON & CLARK, 1990)
صفحه 47:
JONES ET AL., 2000
Major Product ک
Technology S-curve
Ineremental Product
& Process Innovation
Major Process
Innovation
ا
4 ورس وروی PY,
‘Transitional Specific
prc
Em of Ferment Era of Incremental Change
(Design Competition, Substitution) (Blaboration of the Dorninant Design)
Emergence of
‘Dominant Design