صفحه 1:
عنا0151©
00
Industry
نا
0
Basics
۱ 4
Ne deo
67
صفحه 2:
Cll Benchmarking.
|
Objectives |
aol Tay definitions — ایجاد تعاریف
عمومی
norms 8 +
°Determi he 7 e of best
practices
صفحه 3:
Benchmarking - a systematic process o
measuring one’s performance against
recognized leaders for the purpose of
determining best_practices that lead to
It is part of a continuous improvement
۴۲۵۵55
one تیان ل نا مه طم ph قي
و0 organization
صفحه 4:
Strategic Benchmarkiy
Berea O16 =\ 1-10] a oo) alg Y= V=V=< =v
business
- Non competitive
- Examines non ipdustry ۲۵۱۰۰۱۵۰۱۵۱۲
7197171 فقاوه وله 89زور روو(ه روت
Study of competitors | -
۱۹۲/۱2۰۵۱۱۵۱
اه processes against
0 را بر ات۱۱۱۱ ۳۹
database interrogations at 7
صفحه 5:
18/2 تست
Proce La
-“ معو
ime Tae [2] 2S. توجه به نیع
of company —
ا
conducting a particular business
rocess
ارتقا یک پروسه ویخره بای متال پرروسه ت
©0666 ميدن
ea. Process —- Chanqe
۱
CG
صفحه 6:
07
performed by
۵0
benchmarking
analysts
Low - Can use
trained
company
personnel or
consultants
4 سس
High —
۰
industries to determine
opportunities for strategic
change initiatives in core
business processes.
The analysis of relative
اک سا زا تس
competito
Suc)
conducted as “blind” studies
كلا للك لانن ak SSSI
The analvsic of nerformance
Types of Benchmar
of
Performance
۳ —_
صفحه 7:
ure
10
Determine critical success factors i=
200۳00۲۱۵16 ۵
صح 300۳00۲۱39 1060۲5
(representative) tossetvey
Identify appropriate populatia
compare to
Obtain data for comparisor
Determine performance and process
Determine 2001 ١ فك _ 2
arr) S| | I
Select.best practices to narrow procesg&
au
7.
۳ gaps
~8\l lmplement best practices& لاسي
صفحه 8:
8
رضایت مشتری أکلحت وت زوو(ه» 61۳2
7
Planned | 7
- CG, BF, absolute
SG, SF,
RIR, LWCIR, يل
Accidents
Quality performance ةا
cost
. Achieving d 7 ۲
. Cost perfo
©
صفحه 9:
Basis for 56۱۲-۸۵۷
5
a
ل نالك
here should نالا 6005 your effor
كجا بايد تلاشتان را متم كن كنيد ؟
Cost Performance
Schedule
و2119
' 85 نی ۳۳۳۰
۳ Quality?
Cll
صفحه 10:
Cost BA are
-Cost a
a. ec
-Phase
cr ۳ 1
صفحه 11:
Performance Metric NORMS
| Cost Performan ۳
Compare to
Metric 59 [Value Quartile “sy orowate
[Project Cost Growth 091
[Delta Cost Growth . vailable Soon
[Design Cost Growth
[Procurement Cost Growth
rruction Cost Growth 63۳13۳۲3
[Pre-Project Planning Phase Cost Factor
[Design Phase Cost Factor
‘rocurement Phase Cost Factor
|Construction Phase Cost Factor
Startup Phase Cost Factor
صفحه 12:
oup: Heavy Indust
Project Cost Growth for Project O51:
Respondent Type: Owner Database: Domestic
gory: SISMM Industry
Project Type; All
Project Nature: Grass Roots
Project Cost Growth Score:
صفحه 13:
حل
A)
W
0
W
W
5
لك
5
او
fe)
لو :
0(
Schedule
-Schedule Grow:
-Schedule Facto
-Phase eo 1
Factors |
5۳5۵
ra
cil”
صفحه 14:
‘Delta Schedule Growth
Pre-Project Planing Phas
Factor
Design Phase Duration Factor
Procurement Phase Duration Factor
‘Construction Phase Duration Factor
Startup Phase Duration Factor
صفحه 15:
Project Schedule
‘Respondent Type:
Cost Category: Al
Project Type: All
Project Schedule Growth S
Beat
100%
90%
boy
ase 8
27
صفحه 16:
صفحه 17:
۱ کت[ ee Te
Factor Le ل
Rework Ps 3 4
“Tol Field Rework Festor 058 (2
صفحه 18:
stage... MN
ات مه
Continual analysis & reassess
Objective results
BM methodology must be a
Significance of results must be
۳ must be justified by 0| عات
26
2 وتزد۱ aoc integrity 0
sake of findings
Paes با 0 eon 2 خلاقی:
3 Avhigh code of ethics is essential
“10. Successful SEN ins ob ana sls,
nlanned annroach
aay ise ee ی
صفحه 19:
ra ees ran
commitment
12.Must establish & enfo;
13. Must report-indings fe
management :
۱۳۱ هت اروت زر
06۲50۳۳6۱
15.Access to a benchmarking
16.Use of a good MIS - manag
| 1 15101191361011 51/566151 8
۱۳۵۱۱۵۹/۰ ۰ ام سای ساني مطانمت )8ت حقلع؟ | كع
& external)
صفحه 20:
ste] Agee 3
Benchmarking J
1. ۳۵۵۲ 0۲ 06۱۳۵ 566۱ ۶5 / ۷۵038
2. Fear of losing competitive a,
sharing ۳ ات
3. Arrogance - a are the best, why
benchmark?”
Response - 1 “How do
‘ou know?”
1
4 Pee ١ 06۳6۳۱۵۲۲ ۲۰۵*657
Which is convenient, but may عم كاسن
5
صفحه 21:
0
صفحه 22:
Benchmarking =
Observations mm
لت 00/9 دراوراه رت ال
requires deep self-assessment-and the
doing to the نو ability to adapt what others
context of your organization.
2. Benchmarking is the application of scientific
methods to process improvement
3. Key is to “Adapt not adopt” - ۷ 0ع 10
Deming
4. 2۱ ۵9 065 206۲ 60۴9۲6 95 3 ۵۲۷۲۵۱
process for Americans - competitiveness
doessbutnot benchmarking, because
9 Yenchmarking requires a كني -
atson 95
صفحه 23:
Soe |
antec L
| prefer to profit by others’ هون and
to control and eventually to
improvement.”
reel OM Cte Tei aaa
much less:than those شید no data ۳9
0,
ee Sapte 0۵ ۳5 ۱6 ذأ أمع دوع يمجع الا“
2
صفحه 24:
Benchmarking E
2 OUG 5 ۳ ۳
being humble enough to admit that
someone else is better at something
and wise enough:to try and learn how 2
to match and even surpass them at و
ite” - ;
you are not keeping score
only practicing.” Phe bs
۳۳5: ۲۳۲۲ ۵ تفت
Schneiderman
Journal of Strategic
وتاي یات روت زو رازه 2-۱
ij January 1999
صفحه 25:
Benchmarking
Bb alele "
۱۳
imble of data is worth more than ا
- Slaughter
Overcoming د to copying can
be difficult: Bm
“From kindergarten onward, we have
been punished fo ایا سا and
rewarded for individual رع ممع باع تطاعة
4 keamwork in the classroom is called
صفحه 26:
Gil Benchmarking Code:
of Conduct =
110g 0] 0)=\ = ee oo
-to guide Committee, staff, and participant
activities
-to promote 7a
36 نت و ور رت رورت
overall effectiveness of the
program |
] آ آ "۲ ۲ | ۲۱ ۲ ] 055
Cla ی تا ری رت ار »راز lalali
سيد به in the Cll Benchmarking and
trics Program.
صفحه 27:
6۱۱ Benchmarking Code:
ey eK ate eam ||
Committee & Staff Principles:
- Confidential treatment of data
" Publishing of aggregated data
only .
" Use of confidentiality
لت تت كت
=, aan SS s fro companies
2 aU eee) of م 3 9۹ 5
benchmarking, research, and
ال ارت زر با activities
۹
صفحه 28:
of Conduct “Ba
Participant Principles: ۱... سر
- Avoid activities that might lea
to bid rigging, restraint of trad
etc.
- Agreement to input em
representative, complete, and
accurate data
|- ‘Will not'séek confidential data Es
from.Committee or staff
Gil” لوي لتك to attendance at
annual trainina and data
صفحه 29:
average, you're
just as close to the
عم 'ناملا سك
0
LInbnnawin
Construc
Construc
tion
tion
Industry
Industry
Institute
Institute
Benchmarking
اصول الگوبرداريBasics
اصول الگو برداري
d
October 19, 2001
Austin, Texas
TM
CII Benchmarking
اهداف الگو برداري
Objectives
برداري
برداري
برداري
الگو
الگو
الگو
اهداف
اهداف
اهداف
برداري
الگوبرداري
الگو
اهداف
اهداف
• Establish common definitions
• Establish metric norms
ايجاد تعاريف
عمومي
ايجاد قواعد
• Determine
گيري اندازه گيري
the value of bestايجاد قواعد اندازه
practices
• Provide member companies a basis
تخمين ارزش
بهترين تمرين ها
for self-analysis
آماده سازي كمپاني
TMبراي خود
هاي عضو
سنجي
Benchmarking
Definition
Benchmarking - a systematic process of
measuring one’s performance against
recognized leaders for the purpose of
determining best practices that lead to
when
and تعريف
شناخته شدهsuperior
در مقابل رهبرانperformance
اندازه گيري عملکرد يك نفر
سيستميadopted
يك پروسه: الگوبرداري
و سودمندutilized
در–حليكه پذيرفتهCII
عالي1995
به منظور تخمين بهترين اعمالي كه هدايت مي كند بسوي عملكرد
است.
It is part of a continuous improvement
process
باعث انتقال ايده ها از يك سازمان به سازمان ديگر مي شود
It involves the transfer of ideas from one
organization to another
TM
Benchmarking
of metrics
بتواند براي مقايسه و توسعه عملrequires
ساده و قابل فهم كهthe
، كيفيuse
اندازه گيري
الگوبرداري نياز به استفاده
quantifiable, simple, and understandable
Types of Benchmarking
انواع الگو برداري
Strategic Benchmarking
استراتژي الگو برداري
– Focuses on potential changes in a
بدون رغيب- روي تغييرات توانمندي در يك حرفه
business
تمركز روي
– Non competitive
شركت هاي بدمن صنعت
– Examines non industry companies
Performance Benchmarking
انجام الگو برداري
مطالعه رقبا
– Study of competitors
– Measures performance
company’s
ديگرانofدرمقابل
ازه گيري پروسه هاي شركت
processes against others
–TM Analysis of industry trends through
تمايالت صنعت از طريق
آناليز
Watson 1992
database interrogations and
surveyszz
Typesبرداريof
Benchmarking
انواع الگو
Process پروسه
–“Face to face” observation of
بدون توجه به نوع
هدف پروسه- صورت” رويت
”صورت به
targetشركت
process
regardless
of type
of company
حرفه ويژه
و بهترين كار براي هدايت پروسه يك
–Seeks best practice
for
conducting a particular business
process
TM
–Purpose is to improve a
پروژه تغيير- - ف ارتقا يك پروسه ويژه براي مثال پروسه تغيير مديريت
particular process
Watson 1992
Types of Benchmarking
Types
برداري
نوع الگو
of
Definition
Resource
منبع نياز
تعريف
Benchm
Requirem
arking
ents
آناليز كالس جهاني صنايع بي رغيب را به منظور تخمين فرصت
Strategic
analysis
world-class
كند
شاهمي
دروني مقايسهThe
ابتكار
استراتژيof
تغيير
ها براي
انجام
Performance
پروسه
پروسه
TM
companies in noncompetitive
industries to determine
opportunities for strategic
change initiatives in core
business processes.
The analysis of relative
business performance among
competitors. Uses openliterature analysis or
conducted as “blind” studies
with 3rd party assistance.
رداري شكل مي گيرد
Medium-Low –
Usually
performed by
trained
benchmarking
analysts
Low – Can use
trained
company
personnel or
consultants
Watson 1992
Benchmarking Steps لگوبرداري
1. Determine critical success factors and
appropriate metrics
خمين فاكتورهاي موفقيت بهراني ومقايسات متريك اختصاصي
2. Identify appropriate sample
شناسايي نمونه اختصاصي ( نماينده ) براي بازديد
(representative) to survey
مقايسه
3. Identify appropriate population
toي شهرت اختصاصي براي
compare to
ت آوردن اطالعات براي مقايسه
4. Obtain data for comparisonوقفه هاي پروسه
تخمين انجا م و
Joldk
5. Determine performance and process gaps
شه اي وقفه كار
6. Determine root cause of performanceكردن پروسه و
وقفه هاي كار
gaps
7. Select best practices to narrow process &
ي موسسه اي
TM
performance gaps
كار
راي ارتقا
Adapted from Watson
1992
8. Implement best practices &
متريك
عامل
Factor
امل
1. Customer satisfaction
رضايت مشتري
survey
انجام طراحي پايه
2. Achieving design
هزينه كارbasis
Planned
انجام برنامه ريزي
3. Cost performance
برنامه ريزي
cost
امنيت اتفاقات كار
4. Schedule performance
absolute كار
schedule
رضايت كيفيت
5. Safety performance
Accidents
TM
6. Quality performance
متريك
Metric
Customer
بررسي مشتري
عي
Actual vs
ه كامل
CG, BF, absolute
SG, SF,
عي
صفر
مشتري، ه
RIR, LWCIR, Zero
Rework,
Basis for Self-Analysis
مبنا براي خود سنجي
Where should you focus your effort
كجا بايد تالشتان را متمركز كنيد ؟
Cost Performance?
Schedule
ايمني ؟
Performance?
Safety? كيفيت ؟
Quality?
هزينه كار ؟
TM
ريزي ؟
Assess Performance
تشخيص كار
پيش بيني اوليه
Actual Total Project Cost - Initial Predicted Project Cost
Cost
Initial Predicted Project Cost
هزينه
– Cost Growth رشد هزينه
پروژه
Actual Total Project Cost
– Budget
Initial Predicted Project Cost + Approved Changes
بودجهFactor
عامل
واست تغييرات
هزينه پيش بيني اوليه
– Phase Cost
مرحله هزينه
Factors
قعي مرحله
Actual Phase Cost
عوامل
TM
Actual Total Project Cost
هزينه واقعي كل پروژه
Cost Performance
هزينه هاي انجام متريك
Metrics
قواعد انجام متريك
هزينه انجام
متريك
رشد هزينه پروژه
رشد هزينه دلتا
رشد هزينه پروژه
رشد هزينه تهيه
رشد هزينه ساخت
فاكتور هزينه مرحله پيش برنامه پروژه
فاكتور هزينه مرحله ط`راحي
فاكتور هزينه مرحله آماده سازي
فكتور هزينه مرحله ساخت
TM
Cost Growth
Comparison
TM
Assess Performance
شناسايي الگو برداري
مدت پيش بيني اوليه پروژه- مدت واقعي كل پروژه
Actual Total Project Duration - Initial Predicted Project Duration
Schedule
Initial Predicted Project Duration
زمان پيش بيني اوليه پروژه
– Schedule Growth رشد برنامه
– Schedule Factor
– Phase Duration
Factors
Actual Total Project Duration
ل پروژه
Initial Predicted Project Duration + Approved Changes
عوامل زمان مرحله
زمان پيش بيني اوليه پروژهActual Phase Duration
Actual
پروژهOverall
واقعيProject
اورهالDuration
زمان
TM
ز
م
قعي مرحله
Schedule Performance
Metrics
متريك هاي انجام برنامه
انجام برنامه
متريك
مقايسه با
پيشرفت برنامه دلتا
رشد برنامه پروژه
فاكتور زماني نقشه طراحي
فاكتور زماني مرحله ساخت
فاكتور زماني تهيه نقشه
فاكتور زماني مرحله ساخت
-+فاكتور زماني مرحله شروع
TM
Schedule Growth
مقايسه رشد برنامه
مقايسه مقايسه
Comparison
صنايع نوع پاسخگويي :مالك
گروهبومي
اطالعاتي :
پايهسنگين :
صنايع
:طبيعت پروژه
ريشه هاي سبز
نوع رده :همه
نوع پر`وژه :همه
TM
Safety Performance
امنيت كار
امنيت
Safety
Total Number of Recordable Cases x 200,000
Total Site Work-Hours
ل گزارش
كل ساعات كار كارگاه
شماره كل تعداد روزهاي از دست رفته حالت هاي ايگس
– RIR
– LWCIR
Total Number of Lost Workday Cases x 200,000
Total Site Work-Hours
نرخ حوادث قابل ذكر
TM
ارگاه
Quality Performance
كار /اجرا كيفي
جمع هزينه مستقيم اجرا مجدد
جمع عامل اجرا مجدد
Total Field Rework
Factor
Total Direct Cost of Field Rework
Actual Construction Phase Cost
هزينه مرحله دائم ساختماني اجرا كارمجدد
مقايسه مجموع
نمودار
ارزش
متريك
جمع عامل اجرا مجدد
TM
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Benchmarking
ضروريات الگو برداري
هدف تعريف شده واضح
Essentials
Clearly
defined purpose
آناليز مستمر
Continual analysis & reassessment
Objective results نتايج عيني
ختصاصي باشد
BM methodology must be appropriate
يج بايد روشن باشد
ج
Significance of results must be clear
Conclusions must be justified by theاطالعات
data
7. Never compromise integrity for the
ق بايد سيستماتيك باشد
sake of findings
8. Investigation must be systematic
اخالقي ضروري است
خالقي
9. A high code of ethics is essential
TM
10. Successful benchmarkingداردrequires
معبر طراحي شدهaق نياز به
Benchmarking
ضروريات الگو برداري
Essentials
11. Requires
senior management
مديريت متعهد
commitment
ايجاد و عالمت گذاري
12. Must establish & enforce milestones
يافته ها به مدير باال گزارش شود
13. Must report findings to senior
ي براي كاركنان شركت
management
دستيابي بهپايگاه اطالعات الگو برداري
14. Internal training for company
personnel
از يك سيستم اطالعات مديريت خوب
15. Access to a benchmarking database
خارجي ) ا، طالعات ( داخلي
16. Use of a good MIS – management
information system
مطالعات
ي ام براي پشتيباني
17. Networks to facilitate studies
(internal
& external)
TM
18. Cadre of professional BM analysts to
Barriers to
Benchmarking
نگراني از كپي به نظر رسيدن
1. Fear of being seen as “copying”
2. Fear of losing competitive advantage by
زاياي رقيب توسط مشاركت
sharing information
3. Arrogance – “we are the best, why
benchmark?”
ما بهترين هستيم- خود ستايي
از كجا مي دانيد ؟- پاسخ
Response – Classic Deming question: “How do
you know?”
4. Benchmarking trap – benchmark that ب الگو برداري
TM
which is convenient, but may not be
Adapted from Watson 1992
important.
Barriers to
Benchmarking
6. Excuses are too easy: معذرت خواهي خيلي آسان است
– We are too small ما خيلي كوچك هستيم
– We are too busy سر ما خيلي شلوغ است
– We are too differentما متفاوت هستيم
ي
– Nobody else does what we doري نمتواند انجام دهد
– We do it better than anyone else
ما از هر كس ديگري بهتر انجام مي دهيم
TM
Adapted from Watson 1992
Benchmarking
م
Observations
مشاهدات الگو برداري ش
1. Benchmarking is far more than اcopying – it
requires deep self-assessmentهand the
دdoing to the
ability to adapt what others are
ا
context of your organization.
ت
2. Benchmarking is the application of scientific
methods to process improvement
ا
ل
3. Key is to “Adapt not adopt” – W.Edward
گ
Deming
وa natural
4. Benchmarking does not come as
process for Americans – competitiveness
ب
does, but not benchmarking, because
ر
TM
benchmarking requires a team دapproach. –
Watson 95
Benchmarking
انديشه هاي الگو برداري
Thoughts
“Fools you are… to say you learn by your
سيله تجربه ياد مي گيريد
experiences…
I prefer to profit by others’ mistakes and
avoid the price of my own.”ديگران سود كنم
زخود مايه بگذارم
- Otto Von
“Measurement
is the first step that leads
Bismarck
هدايت مي كند
to control and eventually to
پيشرفت كنيم
improvement.”
- Harrington
“Errors using inadequate data are
افي خيلي
في
much less than those using no data at ات است
all.”
چارلز بجاج
TM
Benchmarking
Thoughts
الگوبرداري
“Benchmarking
is the practice
ofانديشه هاي
being humble enough to admit that
someone else is better at something
and wise enough to try and learn how
to match and even surpass them at
it.”
“If you are not keeping score,
you’re
- APQC, 1998
only practicing.”
Schneiderman
Performance
Measurement
TM
- Arthur M.
Journal of Strategic
January 1999
ذيريم
عاقل
گيريم
يريم
ده ايد
Benchmarking
انديشه هاي الگو برداري
Thoughts
imble of data is worth more than a ocean of o
- Slaughter
از يك اقيانوس نظر است
Overcoming resistance to copying can
be difficult:
“From kindergarten onward, we have
been punished for working together and
rewarded for individual achievement”
Watson 95
“
يم
سوب مي شود
“Teamwork
in the classroom is called
TM
cheating.”
CII Benchmarking Code
of Conduct هدايت كردن
هدف
Purpose:
–to guide Committee, staff, and participant
activities
توسعه باور
–to promote acceptance
برنامهand
سري كردن فعاليت هاي
–to enhance the professionalism
overall effectiveness of the
program
براي
Compliance with this code is a requirement for
دن در
participation
in the CII Benchmarking and
رنامه
TM
Metrics Program.
CII Benchmarking Code
i
of Conduct
Committee & Staff Principles:
– Confidential treatment of data
Publishing of aggregated data
only
Use of confidentiality
agreements
Permissions from companies
– Use of data to support
benchmarking, research, and
implementation activities
TM
CII Benchmarking Code
هدايت
of Conduct
مديران شركت كننده
Participant Principles:
– Avoid activities that might lead
گاني و غيره
to bid rigging, restraint of trade,
etc.
صحيح
– Agreement to input
representative, complete, and ستجو نكنيم
accurate data
رزش
– Will not seek confidential data
from Committee or staff
– Commitment to attendance at
TM
به انتها نزديك مي شويد، ي مسن هستيد
در صورتيكه در راس قرار داريد
“When you're
average, you're
just as close to the
bottom as you are
the top.”
TM
ناشناخته
-